Persian complex predicates are of particular interest because their semantics are often idiosyncratic and their structure frequently deviates from general rules of Persian syntax. In spite of these peculiarities, Persian complex predicates are not a marginal part of the language. They form an open, productive class, and are more common than simple verbs. Continue reading
I just read an announcement for a new book: What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics, Edited by Martina Penke and Anette Rosenbach, and published this year by John Benjamins. According to the description of the book on the LingusitList, this book focuses on the innateness debate and shows how formal and functional approaches to linguistics have different perspectives on linguistic evidence. The three guiding questions for this volume are: What type of evidence can be used for innateness claims (or UG)?; What is the content of such innate features (or UG)?; and, How can UG be used as a theory guiding empirical research?
This book will be on my list of books to read after I finish my MA Thesis.
The NWO (Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research) Endangered Language Research Programme (ELP) will hold its 2nd International Workshop September 7, 2007, at the University of Amsterdam. The theme of the workshop is Language Description and Linguistic Typology. The keynote speakers will be Dr Peter Austin (SOAS, London), and Dr Claire Moyse-Faurie (CNRS-LACITO, Paris). Read more at: NWO – Invitation to the 2nd International ELP Workshop, September 7, 2007 .